top of page

Price Ceiling & Market Outcomes

Diagram Explanations: 

 

  • Initially, mkt equilibrium is at the point where D and S intersect, with equilibrium price and quantity Pe and Qe -> some hospitals in Indonesia charged COVID-19 swab tests over Rp 2.5 million -> price is too high & becomes unaffordable for low-income consumers -> swab test is a necessity to test whether one is sick -> a price ceiling Pc of Rp 900,000 for COVID-19 swab tests is imposed in Indonesia (Oct 2020) to address cost disparities at private labs -> Pc is set below the equilibrium price Pe so:
     

  1. Lower price at Pc -> producers receive less revenue and profit -> less incentivized to produce -> quantity supplied contracts from Qe to Qs

  2. Lower price at Pc -> swab tests become more affordable as its cheaper -> more demands -> quantity demanded expands from Qe to Qd
     

  • As a result, creates a shortage (Qd-Qs) in the mkt.

Before Pc:

CS = a+b

PS = c+d+e
TS = a+b+c+d+e

​

After Pc:

CS = a+c

PS = e

DWL = b+d

Effects of a Price Ceiling on Consumer & Producer Surplus

Evaluation for diff stakeholders:

1) Consumers

 

  • Consumers that purchase the good -> pay lower price (Pc) compared to Pe -> better-off

    • Necessities are more affordable for these consumers -> decrease costs of living -> increase their disposable income -> improve living standards

​

  • Pc leads to fall in quantity supplied -> some consumers may not get to purchase the good -> worse-off

    • Represented by loss of consumer surplus by area b​

    • Necessities → relatively more inelastic demand

    • CON: Left-out consumers may need to purchase the necessities from black markets to ensure survival

 

2) Producers

​

  • Legal Producers: as Pc set below Pe -> price per good received decreases -> producer revenue & profit  decreases -> worse-off

    • Represented by a loss of producer surplus by area d

    • Necessities have inelastic demand -> when price decreases, producer total revenue decreases too -> worse-off​

​

  • Illegal producers: left-out consumers who can afford higher prices buys from the illicit mkt ->  increased consumption in black mkts -> increased quantity sold (while at a higher price than price ceiling) -> increase in producer revenue & profit -> better-off

    • CON: Bc of this, more legal producers may switch to selling in black mkt -> fuels illicit markets


3) Government

 

  • PRO: gains political support from especially low income households

  • CON: increases maintenance costs for the government in combating the black markets 

Welfare Analysis:

bottom of page